Pattern matching
Pattern matching is a way to apply a pattern to a value, and destructure it in a certain way if the pattern matches.
To start things off, create a file called match.inko
with the following
contents:
import std.stdio.STDOUT
class async Main {
fn async main {
let out = STDOUT.new
let val = Option.Some((42, 'hello'))
match val {
case Some((42, str)) -> out.print(str)
case _ -> out.print('oh no!')
}
}
}
Now run it using inko run match.inko
, and the output should be as follows:
hello
In Inko we use the match
keyword to perform pattern matching, and the case
keyword to specify the different cases to consider. The expression to the right
(e.g. Some((42, str))
) is the pattern to match against. In this case str
is
a "binding pattern", which matches against anything and assigns the matched
value to the str
variable, which we then print to STDOUT.
match
expressions are compiled to decision
trees. Inko's implementation is
based on this
article. If
you're interested in implementing pattern matching yourself, we suggest taking a
look at this
project.
Patterns
Patterns can be simple such as 42
or str
, or more complex such as
Some((42, str))
or { @name = name, @age = 20 or 30 }
. Below is a list of the
various types of supported patterns.
Literals and constants
Pattern matching against literals is supported for values of type Int
, Bool
,
and String
. We can also use constants to specify the pattern:
match 3 {
case 0 -> 'foo'
case 1 -> 'bar'
case _ -> 'baz'
}
match 3 {
case ZERO -> 'foo'
case ONE -> 'bar'
case _ -> 'baz'
}
match true {
case true -> 'foo'
case false -> 'bar'
}
match 'world' {
case 'hello' -> 'foo'
case 'world' -> 'bar'
case _ -> 'baz'
}
When matching against values of these types, Inko treats the values as having an
infinite number of possibilities, thus requiring the use of a wildcard pattern
(_
) to make the match exhaustive. Booleans are an exception to this, as they
only have two possible values (true
and false
).
Enum patterns
If the value matched against is an enum class, we can match against its constructors:
match Option.Some(42) {
case Some(42) -> 'yay'
case None -> 'nay'
}
In this case the compiler knows about all possible constructors, and the use of wildcard patterns isn't needed when all constructors are covered explicitly.
When specifying the constructor pattern only its name is needed, the
name of the type it belongs to isn't needed. This means case Option.Some(42)
is invalid.
Class patterns
Pattern matching can also be performed against regular classes using class literal patterns:
class Person {
let @name: String
let @age: Int
}
let person = Person { @name = 'Alice', @age = 42 }
match person {
case { @name = name, @age = 42 } -> name
case { @name = name, @age = age } -> name
}
Any fields left out are treated as wildcard patterns, meaning the following two match expressions are the same:
match person {
case { @name = name } -> name
}
match person {
case { @name = name, @age = _ } -> name
}
Class literal patterns are only available for regular classes.
Tuple patterns
Pattern matching against tuples is also supported:
match (10, 'testing') {
case (num, 'testing') -> num * 2
case (_, _) -> 0
}
OR patterns
Multiple patterns can be specified at once using the or
keyword:
match number {
case 10 or 20 or 30 -> 'yay'
case _ -> 'nay'
}
This is the same as the following match:
match number {
case 10 -> 'yay'
case 20 -> 'yay'
case 30 -> 'yay'
case _ -> 'nay'
}
Bindings
Patterns can bind values to variables:
match number {
case 10 -> 20
case num -> num * 2
}
Nested patterns
Nested patterns are also supported:
match Option.Some((10, 'testing')) {
case Some((10, 'testing')) -> 'foo'
case Some((num, _)) -> 'bar'
case None -> 'baz'
}
Guards
Guards allow you to set an extra condition for a pattern to be considered a match:
import std.stdio.STDOUT
class async Main {
fn async main {
let out = STDOUT.new
let val = Option.Some((42, 'hello'))
match val {
case Some((num, _)) if num >= 20 -> out.print('A')
case Some((num, _)) -> out.print('B')
case _ -> out.print('oh no!')
}
}
}
If you run this program, the letter "A" is written to the terminal.
In this example, if num >= 20
is the guard that must be met before the code
out.print('A')
is executed. This is useful if the condition is too complex to
express as a pattern.
Typing rules
For a given match
expression, all pattern bodies must return a value of which
the type is compatible with the type of the first pattern's body:
match 42 {
case 42 -> 'foo'
case 50 -> 'bar'
case _ -> 'baz'
}
Here the first pattern's body returns 'foo'
, a value of type String
, and
thus all other pattern bodies must return value compatible with this type.
If pattern bodies return different types but you don't care about them, you can
use nil
like so:
match 42 {
case 42 -> {
foo
nil
}
case 50 -> {
bar
nil
}
case _ -> {
baz
nil
}
}
Ownership and moves
When pattern matching against an owned value, the value is moved into the match expression. When matching the value's components, the input value is destructured into those components:
let input = Option.Some((10, 'testing'))
match input {
case Some((num, string)) -> num
case _ -> 0
}
When the Some((num, string))
pattern matches, the value 10
is moved into
num
, and the value testing
is moved into string
. The variable input
is
no longer available. When num
or string
is dropped, so is the value it
points to.
If the value matched against is a borrow, the match is performed against the borrow. In this case any (sub) values bound are exposed as borrows as well:
let input = Option.Some((10, 'testing'))
match ref input {
# Here `string` is of type `ref String`, not `String`, because the input is a
# ref and not an owned value.
case Some((num, string)) -> string
case _ -> 0
}
Drop semantics
When pattern matching, any bindings introduced as part of a pattern are dropped at the end of the pattern's body (unless they are moved before then). When matching against an owned value and the value is destructured, Inko performs a "partial drop" of the outer value before entering the pattern body. A partial drop doesn't invoke the type's destructor, and doesn't drop any fields (as those are moved into bindings or wildcard patterns as part of the match):
match Option.Some(42) {
case Some(value) -> { # <- The Option is dropped here, but not the value
# wrapped by the Some.
value
}
case None -> 0
}
For borrows, we just drop the borrow before entering the pattern body:
match values.opt(4) {
case Some(42) -> {
# This is valid because the `ref Option[Int]` returned by `values.opt(4)` is
# dropped before we enter this body. If we didn't, the line below would
# panic, because we'd try to drop the old value of `values.opt(4)` while a
# borrow to it still exists.
values.set(4, Option.Some(0))
}
case _ -> nil
}
If a pattern contains any bindings (e.g. Some(a)
in the above case), those
bindings are dropped at the end of the body. This means that if you match
against a value, bind a sub value to a variable, then drop the value (e.g. by
assigning it a new value), you'll run into a drop panic.
Exhaustiveness
When performing pattern matching, the match must be exhaustive, meaning all possible cases must be covered:
import std.stdio.STDOUT
class async Main {
fn async main {
let out = STDOUT.new
let val = Option.Some((42, 'hello'))
match val {
case Some((42, str)) -> out.print(str)
}
}
}
If you try to run this program, you'll be presented with the following compile-time error:
match.inko:8:5 error(invalid-match): not all possible cases are covered, the following patterns are missing: 'None', 'Some((_, _))'
In the first example we took care of making the match exhaustive using the _
pattern, known as a "wildcard pattern", which matches everything. We can make
the match exhaustive in a variety of ways, such as the following:
import std.stdio.STDOUT
class async Main {
fn async main {
let out = STDOUT.new
let val = Option.Some((42, 'hello'))
match val {
case Some((42, str)) -> out.print(str)
case Some((_, str)) -> out.print(str)
case None -> out.print('none!')
}
}
}
Redundant patterns
Apart from requiring the match to be exhaustive, the compiler also notifies you of redundant patterns:
import std.stdio.STDOUT
class async Main {
fn async main {
let out = STDOUT.new
let val = Option.Some((42, 'hello'))
match val {
case Some((42, str)) -> out.print(str)
case Some((42, str)) -> out.print(str)
case _ -> out.print('oh no!')
}
}
}
If you run this, you'll be presented with the following warning:
test.inko:10:7 warning(unreachable): this code is unreachable
The second case
is unreachable because it's the same as the first case
. Of
course the compiler is also able to detect more complicated redundant patterns:
import std.stdio.STDOUT
class async Main {
fn async main {
let out = STDOUT.new
let val = Option.Some((42, 'hello'))
match val {
case Some((a, _)) -> out.print('A')
case Some((42, str)) -> out.print(str)
case _ -> out.print('oh no!')
}
}
}
Here the patterns aren't quite the same, but the compiler is still able to
detect that the second case
is redundant.
Limitations
- Range patterns aren't supported, instead you can use pattern guards.
- Types defining custom destructors can't be matched against.
async
classes can't be matched against.- Matching against
Float
isn't supported, as you'll likely run into precision/rounding errors.